This shuffling is a powerful tool, because it leaves the text (seen as 'word inventory') intact, yet it removes the meaning.
We saw from the example of nablator and the TT transcription (Takeshi, not Torsten) that it does not go to the hypothetical maximum. This is why I started using the term hypothetical.
One could see the 'theoretical' maximum as the result for a case where all words have been shuffled. Because some repeated word pairs would arise arbitrarily.
In principle it should be possible to actually predict this, but I don't feel up to that now.
There's a hint of a suspicion that the green and grey dots are a little bit above the 'real text' dots.
We saw from the example of nablator and the TT transcription (Takeshi, not Torsten) that it does not go to the hypothetical maximum. This is why I started using the term hypothetical.
One could see the 'theoretical' maximum as the result for a case where all words have been shuffled. Because some repeated word pairs would arise arbitrarily.
In principle it should be possible to actually predict this, but I don't feel up to that now.
There's a hint of a suspicion that the green and grey dots are a little bit above the 'real text' dots.

