01-09-2019, 04:34 AM
(01-09-2019, 02:00 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(31-08-2019, 06:43 PM)Morten St. George wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Moreover, I see that they colored the bull in the same vermilion color as some of the clothing in order to deceive you into thinking it was all continuous.
You pre-decide everything. You start with the assumption and then force the data to follow your assumption.
You should START with the data and see where it leads. It's very presumptuous to think you can guess so soon why they made the colors similar.
This reminds me of the psychologist who went to the teacher and said he was concerned about the mental health of one of her students because of the colors she chose for all her drawings. The teacher was concerned as well. When the parent asked the girl why she was doing this she said it was because the other crayons were used up. The psychologist and the teacher jumped to conclusions.
Good research means not jumping to conclusions.
From a while back in this thread I've been fearless to say what I think in full confidence that you would soon set things straight when I go astray.
No, I cannot prove that the coloring of the bull is marginalia. But when I realized that they may have swapped out the nudes for Capricorn and Aquarius in order to bring in clothes for Aries and Taurus, I suspected some action to cover up such treachery.
Besides, did you ever see a real bull of color vermilion?
It's less than an hour to September, and I'm committed to start decoding work in October, which doesn't leave a lot of time to get ready.
I'll post some status updates in the coming days and I look forward to your help especially with regard to parsing Voynichese script.

