Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

Second, because the drawings ARE ON THE BACKS of the folios of the other drawings. The pages cannot be missing if the front of one has the first zodiac and the back of the same leaf has the next one.

You're confusing me here. Surely you are not trying to claim that the page with Taurus clothes is not You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. but some other number? That disagrees with the VIB which shows You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (Taurus clothes) as opposite You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (Aries clothes). It does not show either of them opposite nudes.

Here's the layout per voynich.nu:



Yes, but look at this:



To me, the separation between folio 71 (clothes) and the rest of quire 11 (nudes) looks like an open break glued together at the top and bottom. This contrasts with paper folds (on the right) seen elsewhere in quire 11. Moreover, I see that they colored the bull in the same vermilion color as some of the clothing in order to deceive you into thinking it was all continuous.

Pending a fresh examination of the manuscript by a layout expert, I will continue to postulate that a single folio (clothes front and back) was extracted from the missing European section and inserted into the New World section in order to produce two Aries. The second Taurus results from depiction on the back of the second Aries. It was only Aries that they wanted to duplicate.

The two Aries stanzas are the only VMS prophecies found in the entire third group of one hundred stanzas. In view of the Incantation's open condemnation of astrology, the appearance of two Aries drove them crazy, and I am here referring to medieval authors as well as our decoders.

Another matter that confounded them was "the divine calendar": they were never able to figure out in what year it began.