In my opinion, it is the task of the one who designs a theory to present it validatable. This is a particularly challenging task for "unknown terrain" such as the VMS. Possible valid and half-baked theories differ exactly on this point. Theories that are designed the way that they are neither provable nor refutable have a quality problem. The principle "I am right as long as nobody can refute me" is trivial and should not apply to serious research (reversal of the burden of proof).
I am still more interested in well-made theories that have been controversially discussed than in sensational, unprovable "beliefs."
I am still more interested in well-made theories that have been controversially discussed than in sensational, unprovable "beliefs."