05-06-2019, 10:34 AM
(05-06-2019, 09:11 AM)nablator wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(05-06-2019, 04:56 AM)ReneZ wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.As it stands, these word patterns and limited character combinations 'just happened'. In that sense, the theory is inadequate, even if it explains some other features.
Well, if there were enough constraints, the VMS could have "just happened" and we are left with the impossible task of explaining arbitrary choices. What didn't happen didn't happen, there does not have to be a reason for everything.
If someone manages to provide a convincing plain text, then we will be able to see what happened.
In that case, this meaningful plain text is a big part of the proof that this is correct.
Now in case the text is meaningless, then this plain text does not exist, and the rest of the evidence needs to be much stronger in order for this 'solution' to be convincing.
For me this includes:
- some explanation what caused the word patterns (even if it is just a better pattern scheme than we have now).
- some explanation about the differences between the A and B languages

