Discussion of "A possible generating algorithm of the Voynich manuscript"

[Torsten]

I'm not arguing against the observations here. I think they're interesting and worth discussing. I'm simply remarking that I wish they could be discussed without the accompanying theory. The observations might well be valid for all researchers and stand the test of time.

You could start a new thread to discuss just the observations.

But I'm not going to be the only one who rejects your conclusions.

Even if many would reject the conclusions, they can still be true.

There's a deep structure (which I doubt we fully understand) to Voynich words. Your theory does not adequately explain or handle that word structure.

I wonder if you had read the explanation for the rigid word structure on page 10:
"The rules to modify a source word normally don’t affect the order of the glyphs. This is one reason for the observation that the words in the VMS share the same rigid word structure. Additionally, ..."