Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

Is it an armadillo or a pangolin?

Or is it a ram?

Doesn't matter. Since we don't know what it is, we cannot use it as evidence.

It's all one big hypothesis, based on small individual hypotheses.

The strongest arguments for the armadillo do not come from Tucker but from supporters of the modern forgery theory, that is, from people who take a more scientific approach.

I think they didn't know what an armadillo was and that's why a depiction of the armadillo, but not any depiction of native Americans, got through (ie. is not included in an unknown amount of missing pages).

PS 1. The depicted armadillo is in the process of rolling itself up into a ball to protect itself from the gal who wants to use it to make a skirt. I'm not sure without looking it up, do pangolins also roll themselves into a ball for protection?

PS 2. I'm not so sure a ram is worthy of consideration.