27-03-2016, 04:52 PM
Maybe it is supposed to represent eyes, but in that case the interpretation of the first word as "mullier" is still relevant. Both Velinska and I independently saw it as representing female parts, so it does look like it.
Maybe the marginalia just read something like (I paraphrase):
"Guys, are these eyes supposed to look like women's parts?"
"Woman parts or eyes? Plz help thx"
"Vag-eye-nas. Hurr durr."
Okay not the last one. But the ambiguity might be exactly what prompted the writing of the marginalia, that's what I mean.
Maybe the marginalia just read something like (I paraphrase):
"Guys, are these eyes supposed to look like women's parts?"
"Woman parts or eyes? Plz help thx"
"Vag-eye-nas. Hurr durr."
Okay not the last one. But the ambiguity might be exactly what prompted the writing of the marginalia, that's what I mean.