14-04-2019, 04:51 AM
(14-04-2019, 02:11 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Morten, the problem is that you jump on the very first thing you see that might support your theory and completely ignore other possible interpretations.
The meaning of 116v is by no means understand.
There are multiple threads on it with different ways of looking at it by some very intelligent researchers. You get one new piece of information (SAL) and IMMEDIATELY you grab the first thing that works for YOU, but which might NOT be the right interpretation.
You are perfectly correct in what you say. As soon as I saw that you had found a "S A L", I immediately suspected that it could be the inverse of something and I was not surprised to find that it was.
Some thirty years ago I saw a prophecy that said "Of the seven branches it shall boil down to three, The eldest (more than one male) shall be surprised by death, To kill the two brothers they shall be seduced…." It made me think of the assassination of the Kennedy brothers, JFK and RFK, from where I calculated that they had to have had four sisters at the time of their death. Learning things in advance of external confirmation has been an ongoing story ever since.
I do not ignore other interpretations; for the most part, I simply have no knowledge of them. Since I have been banned from posting in any thread other than this one, I seldom look at the other threads.
It's possible that your own work might not be beyond criticism. For example, just above the "S A L", on the same blog page, you note that someone called Pelling claims that "a single plant seems to appear in three separate places in the manuscript: f17v, f96v, and f99r", to which you respond "No way!"
Technically, looking at the three plants in isolation, you might be right. But can't you see that those three plants look a lot more like each other than any of the three look like any other plant in the VMS? It is fully rational to suspect that they could all be the same plant or at least that they may have some connection.
On f116v, you think "pox" means goat. Can't you see that the x is in much darker ink than the preceding po and hence could be overwriting a different letter? Can't you see that the VMS is largely a book about botany, not zoology?
My analysis demonstrates that You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. points to prophecy V-35 in multiple ways, far too many for any reasonable person to write it off as a coincidence. It is therefore a tremendous break for would-be decoders: chances are excellent that we now know what some of quire 20 has to say.