Resolving whether 86v is a map or not

[Linda]

[quote="Nikolai" pid='26654' dateline='1555175427'

This page is not a map. In the encyclopedia "Britannica" 1771 edition is a description of the then state "Great Tartary". The structure of this state is shown on this page. I was able to translate a few words of one group: "tribe", "desire", "maybe", "negotiate, conclude a contract", "country". Based on the meaning of the words, we can assume that the sentence may have the following meaning. "A country may be formed as a result of the desire of the tribes to conclude a Treaty." I was able to translate a few more groups of words. Their meaning corresponds to the above.

How would imagery outlining the structure of the state of Great Tartary not be a map?

How is the edition of the encyclopedia relevant? Why wouldnt you just quote the relevant information if is it so particular to this edition? Or at least link to it?

How were you able to translate these words, what are their corresponding locations on the page? 

We cannot assume anything. More info is required to make a determination on the veracity of your claims.



At this point i find them highly doubtful.

Encyclopedia "Britannica" 1771 edition is freely available on the Internet. I attach a fragment of the picture and the words that I was able to translate (Fig. 1). My translation technique can be found here:  You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

So you skipped some questions.

What is it if not a map, in relationship to documenting the creation of a state. ie what then is itWhat does the imagery portray? A frilly declaration of independence?

I figured it is accessible, i am asking what is so special about the entry in this particular edition of this particular encyclopedia? Will i know it when i see it or something? 

21 references. It doesnt call me to figure which one you are talking about.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Here is a blog about looking up tartary in said encyclopedia. Is it in there?
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Something wrong with wiki version? I think i get the idea.
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

Do you have an aversion to adding clickable links? My device is not working great, it wont let me copy the link i can highlight only at the moment. I am working on other stuff in the backgound, dont want to reboot just so i can see what you are talking about. So i fixed your link.

Found an ancient language, the format (or structure) of the alphabet which coincided with the format (or structure) of the characters used in the text. But then it did not go smoothly. The structure of the complex characters and the alphabet of the proposed language are identical, but the number of letters was slightly more.  I had to go back to the text.  As a result, a numerical mark was found in the text itself.  Using this mark as a hint and securing a certain number of characters in two letters, everything fell into place. Later in the translation of some short words specified fixing characters for the letters was confirmed.  This is the second level of encryption of the Voynich manuscript.  Further, after analyzing the text with the already available data, it was found that in words that begin with vowels, these vowels are omitted.  Moreover, and within words vowels are used very rarely.  This can be considered the third level of encryption.  These two circumstances further exclude the possibility of using computer programs to translate the text of the manuscript Voynich.   "Manual" translation is also difficult. For example, if a word in the text consists of 4 characters, then this supposed word will correspond to 8 letters, 4 of which must be excluded.    Thus, without a perfect knowledge of the language of ancestors can not do. When I translated short words, I used information obtained on the Internet, and they are there, as you know, limited and only conventional use.  And in this case we have specific themes and ancient language.

So i read this as 'a lot of unconfirmable guesswork'.



I will leave that to your theory page to discuss, what i really wanted to know is what you call it, if not a map.
I assume you do not mean physical structure but what structure then?