Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

Don't you understand the most basic rules of grammar? Dabas is the imperfect indicative, it refers to a past action that has been interrupted. The closest English translation would be you had given and the verb refers to the action of passing, giving or producing. IE I thought that you were giving me the ball (Creí que me dabas la pelota).

What on earth do you think you gave wave means? It's nonsensical in any language. 

You'd be better off saying that it means Cauldron of beans (Ol[l]a d[e]'[f]abas - Ola d abas) which at least makes more sense

David,

I gather from what you say here that you have a more rational explanation of the marginalia oladabas, so please let us know what it is.

The use of ola, wave, makes sense in the context of the aforementioned sea and, in fact, wave can stand for the sea in poetry. Let's look at the complete prophecy where you find mer, sea, in the first verse.



The use of dabas rather than dio could indicate continuous action in the past as opposed to a one-time action. Note the "encores", encore, in the second line. Thus, for example, this could refer to something like the following: repeated attempts by Argentina to take to the waves (sea) to seize ("prendre") the Falkland Islands, beginning in the early 19th century and renewed in the late 20th century. 

The marginalia on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. begins pox leber which I, with justifications, interpret as por liber, by free, or "par franche" in French. We find the city, cité, in "ubren", urbe or urban from the 4th line of You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. marginalia.

In the second line of the prophecy, note the word "porte" which corresponds to the "portas" at the end of the second line of the f116v marginalia. Most of all, I show that the Roman numerals in the second and third lines can add up to 535, the number of the respective prophecy.

And I will remind you that the sequence of glyphs at the start of the 4th line of marginalia on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. reappears on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and nowhere else in the entire manuscript. There is every reason to suspect that we are being provided with a Rosetta Stone for undertaking a fresh decoding of quire 20.

PS #1. It looks like you can read Spanish, so I'll mention that many years ago I wrote in Spanish and some of it is still online:

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

PS #2. It cannot be recommended that you attempt to read the oracles of Delphi.