[split] Diplomatic ciphers

[Mark Knowles]

JKP: I have described ways to address positionality in Nick's blog which could be the anagram approach or just how the true text is chopped up into words i.e. where spaces are placed, so this does not necessarily preclude advanced substitution ciphers. By working with glyph strings as opposed to individual glyphs you can greatly increase the number of true glyphs then you can also add rare characters which map to individual words and then you can have a large number of distinct mappings. So in this way your objections could still not remove the possibility of an "atypical" diplomatic cipher.

The real question to me is what do we see with labelese?