Morten St George Theory

[-JKP-]

Your task is to reciprocate JKP's efforts by actually reading the many posts on JKP's blog. 
Yes reading them, not just scanning through one post to copy/paste a picture.
Yes, this may take some time, but I'm sure it will lead to  a better quality discussion in the future.

Does that seem fair?

I've spent a little time over the past few days looking at diverse blogs (as I had promised to do). One of the more interesting things I found was this page from Koen's blog,

You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.

where I read the following about Currier's insights:

Additionally, after analysis of the handwriting, he estimated that "six to eight scribes (copyists, encipherers, call them what you will)" penned the main text. For him, there was only one possible conclusion: "It must be a copying job."

What I fail to understand (and would like to know) is why you guys are rejecting Currier's copying job theory. Do you have technical evidence that would contradict his findings? If so, I would like to know what it is.

Morten, you're doing it again. You are making things up.

We do not reject the idea that the VMS is a copy of something. The possibility is mentioned on a regular basis. I don't know anyone who has openly rejected the possibility.