19-03-2019, 12:44 AM
(This post was last modified: 19-03-2019, 12:45 AM by Morten St. George.
Edit Reason: fix EVA lgyphs
)
(18-03-2019, 12:12 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.The differences between Curriers A and B are actually fairly minor.
JP, With regard to the frequency of use of a popular glyph in relation to the frequency of use of the other popular glyphs, there appears to be enormous differences between Herbal A and Herbal B as well as between either of those and what we find in the Deep Text section:
![[Image: img-vms-lang-currier.jpg]](http://manuscrit-de-voynich.com/img-vms-lang-currier.jpg)
Though thematic content can possibly explain some of the differences between Herbal and Deep Text, it seems doubtful that this alone can explain discrepancies between Herbal A and Herbal B.
Tower glyphs EVA f and p appear in the first line of paragraphs throughout but are far more likely to be seen mid-paragraph in the Herbal sections than in the Deep Text section. This also could be significant because I suspect these glyphs serve as alignment markers for decoding purposes.
In brief, I find no reason to conclude that the entire VMS is uniformly encoded. Please explain why you think otherwise.

