Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

The differences between Curriers A and B are actually fairly minor.

I view lang B as the older, encrypted text. lang A is largely the plant stuff which had to have come later, and it seems likely there would have been neither motive nor capacity to encrypt that. Does lang A have original sequences of glyphs or can most of it be a copying and joining together of segments of glyphs drawn from the lang B pages?

Another possibility is that the lang B pages include a lot of lang A text, that is, not all lines in the deep text section constitute an encoding of some language, being instead a direct writing in the same unknown language seen on the lang A pages, thereby accounting for similarities between lang A and lang B.

If the Rosicrucians were able to read the text that accompanied the plant drawings, I very much doubt that they would have thought that the VMS depicted exotic plants from the garden of King Solomon, nor would they have incurred the great expense of producing the massive investigation of plants called The Herball or Generall Historie of Plantes.