Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

Morten,
you say:
"I'd classify those archaeologists as pseudo-scientists just like the Nazi archaeologists who went there searching for the Cathar treasure which was really no more than the VMS prophecies! "

This is outrageous.
The conclusions of the article I linked are confirmed by numerous other studies by various other archaeologists, and have been confirmed many times over. Of course, some details will never be known, but things like the number of towers and layout of the walls and the basic floorplan are well established, and have been since the 1980's. They do not match the Voynich castle.

The plans of the 13th century castle can be found online. I won't put up any more links here, nor provide any more free research for you, since you have decided that anything that contradicts your theory is "pseudo-science". The author of the article I linked earlier is a professor emeritus at the top school of social sciences in France: to call him a pseudo-scientist and compare him to a Nazi is absurd. Ironically, his archaeological work on Montsegur was praised by Henri Paul Eydoux, who was an eminent historian of medieval architecture... and a decorated member of the Resistance during WW2.

I understand it is upsetting to have one's theory dismantled by actual academic research, but if your reaction to facts is to say that it is then the scientists who must be engaging in "pseudo-science" and to compare them to Nazis.... wow.
It takes a lot of  bad faith to reach such a conclusion.
I really regret wasting my time digging up facts for you, since you obviously are oblivious to them.

I was working under the assumption that the VMS depiction had some connection to the Cathars who escaped the siege on March 14, 1244, and, having lived there, those Cathars would have had a good idea of what that fortress looked like.

The only medieval image of Montségur that I was able to find does not disagree with the VMS depiction (to the extent of the tower that is visible), and I found nothing in Inquisition records of the siege that would lead me to believe that the VMS depiction was inaccurate.

Common sense tells me that when there are no ruins (as I said, the stones of the Cathar fortress were removed from the mountain), there is little archaeologists can do. I also know that stone cannot be dated, so if there were any foundations there, it would be impossible to determine if it was the foundation of the pre-Cathar fortress of the 12th century or a post-Cathar foundation.

And not for one second do I believe that these archaeologists found the original, genuine blueprints for the construction of the Cathar fortress. If such a thing ever existed, the Inquisition would have burned it.

Know that Montségur, like the VMS, is a major field of quackery and scientists are not immune. So let's just leave it that you go your way and I'll go mine.