Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

There were several cisterns, according to the archaeologists who wrote the article, about one per every three terraces.
The houses you show are not on the cliff-faces but on the other side, the flat "passage" between the two rosettes, no amount of cropping the image will conceal that... 
You have not proven me wrong. You are denying that the scholarly article written by a qualified professional  based on years of on-site excavations and previous academic publications is valid. Your basis for this is some blue paint and hunches.

Though few drawings have survived, extensive written records of the fall of Montségur were made by the Inquisition and others. They tell us that the Cathars had anticipated the attack by the French army and made an enormous effort to store up enough food and water to last a very long time. Whether that effort included cisterns, I do not know. Montségur mountain was occupied for hundreds of years both before and after the brief time that the Cathars spent there. How were your archaeologists able to date those cisterns precisely to the first half of the 13th century?

The houses I showed you were clearly built on a steep slope and that depiction comes from the rosettes page close to the fortress. That does not prove those houses are on Montségur mountain but they certainly could be.

I really don't know what you think I'm trying to prove you wrong on. Archaeology alone can't prove that the VMS depiction isn't the Cathar fortress because the mountain was occupied for a millennium but the Cathar fortress stood there for no more than forty years and left no ruins. Historical records say the fortress was rebuilt and then "expanded" by the Cathars so surely it had to larger than the 17th-century chateau.

I'd classify those archaeologists as pseudo-scientists just like the Nazi archaeologists who went there searching for the Cathar treasure which was really no more than the VMS prophecies!