03-03-2019, 09:29 PM
(03-03-2019, 08:26 PM)Morten St. George wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.(03-03-2019, 07:30 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Many people have commented on this looking steep. It has always looked steep to me too, but I try to be careful not to assume too much too soon.
There are thousands of mountain-top fortresses in Europe, parts of the Middle East, and parts of Africa. Many of those in Ethiopia and parts of Greece were built according to European designs.
Montségur mountain didn't just look steep. It was steep:
It was no doubt common to build castles on mountain tops because that made them easier to defend, but perhaps nowhere else were the vertical slopes so pronounced as at Montségur. Moreover, the Cathar fortress is the most likely for another reason: it was completely dismantled and hence cannot be matched with the VMS depiction, whereas we know for certain that the other mountaintop castles, still extant, do not produce a match.
So because we dont know what it looked like, it makes it a better match than anything still in existence that doesnt look like it? Only because your imagination is set free by the lack of constraint. What about all the other castles that no longer exist? They are discounted because it would not add to your theory.
However i cannot see anything resembling the vms castle fitting on your hill. It would need all the unexplained steep walls to be built to keep it from toppling off the back end of the mountain.
![[Image: img-voynich-fortress-montsegur.jpg]](http://mortenstgeorge.info/img-voynich-fortress-montsegur.jpg)


![[Image: img-montsegur-mountain.jpg]](http://mortenstgeorge.info/img-montsegur-mountain.jpg)