Morten St George Theory

[Linda]

From the Wiki on Soncino castle, the one you illustrated:

"In 1200 it was besieged several times by the armies of Milan and Brescia, and in 1283, after being destroyed by the attacks of those armies, the commune of Soncino decided to rebuild the castle. In 1312 the castle was occupied by the Cremonese army, and in 1391 by the Milanese army, using it during the war against the Venetian Republic. In the year 1426 new walls were added to raise the previous ones."

It's possible the swallowtail merlons were added in 1426 when they raised the walls. They might even have been added in the 16th or 17th century when a lot of castles were remodeled or expanded.

JP, For the purpose of our investigation, the timeline stops circa 1420, the carbon date of the VMS. Anything that happened after that is irrelevant.

Supporters of the Northern Italy theory claim that the swallowtail merlons were in use by 1420. A while back, I checked out in google.it every named castle with those merlons that I could find in image searches. I was satisfied that at least some of those swallowtails were extant in the 14th century though I could not affirm that any of them predate the fall of Montségur in 1244.

If, as you say, the swallowtails had religious or political significance, it would make sense to reinstate the swallowtails when rebuilding a destroyed castle.

The carbon dating does not pinpoint to 1420. 

I agree that it seems plausible the merlons were added in 1426, especially given the different brick colour. The only way to prove they were there prior to that is to find a descrption, drawing, or painting of them from prior to that date. 

Whether or not this is relevant to the vms is another question. I dont think the depiction is specific to anything in particular other than the general concentration of this style of architecture in northern italy at the time, of which your offering is an example. However if it does represent a specific castle or city, as you suggest, your example does not appear to match the rest of the architecture depicted, which i would expect it to, if indeed it is meant to portray this specific place.

Interesting though, this might support some of your thoughts on the matter. But it would have nothing to do with the subsequent usage or reparations to the castle you speak of. 
You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.