25-02-2019, 12:59 PM
(25-02-2019, 05:46 AM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.So you're saying they faked almost two-centuries-old handwriting on 116v. You haven't presented any evidence for this and it's not a very plausible assertion.
If you find handwriting of the 15th century on f116v, you can say that it could not have been written in the 14th century, but you cannot say that it could not have been written in the 16th or 17th centuries.
In general, your methods are invalid in cases where we find the use of encryption or a motive for deception. The marginalia was written by protestants during an epoch of vicious religious warfare between protestants and Catholics, and there was no guarantee that the protestants would win. They therefore adopted an old handwriting style to mislead the Inquisition in case the Catholics won.
The following marginalia helps to connect the VMS to the Nostradamus prophecies: the folio numbers, the quire numbers, the zodiac months, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. Latin letters, You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. writings, recipe star red coloring, recipe star tails, recipe star stray markings. There is therefore ample reason to believe that all of this marginalia was written by same person(s) at the same time.
Quote:But the Mexican conquest is a century AFTER the radiocarbon dating, regardless of when the material was originally written, and assuming the VMS dense text is recipes (which we don't know), and assuming it's natural language (for which there is, as yet, no proof).
I have been repeatedly trying to explain to you that European protestants (under the duress of severe persecution in Europe) migrated to the New World in the 13th century. Since this particular sect of protestants didn't believe in procreation, there is today no evidence of their presence in the New World other than the VMS itself and Indian legends. The non-botanical sections of the Beinecke MS would therefore be a copy of their writings made by the second or third generation of Indian converts to their religion.
The marginalia indicates that the dense text section of the VMS is encoded. The botanical sections of the VMS could be either Indian natural language or gibberish.
Quote:This has nothing to do with the radiocarbon dating or whether the last page is fake handwriting. Most nonfiction books are copied or partly copied from other sources. So what?
The situation is that you have been trying to associate the VMS with 15th century Europe when you should really be looking at 13th century Europe.