Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

Hi all! What are you talking about lads? There is no secrets or some magic, just read that or ask. If somebody has some questions about a particular page, e-mail me.

Hi Aldis. I'm not surprised you are confused. In the Morten St. George Theory thread we debate the official history of the VMS as told by Wikipedia versus my fringe theories which are largely derived from esoteric texts of the 16th and 17th centuries.

In my last post I insinuated that a signature found on page f1r, of a famed supporter of the Catholic faith, was likely a forgery because my esoteric texts reveal that the owners of the VMS were strong opponents of the Counter Reformation. Similarly, letters that would place the VMS in the hands of Kircher, a famous Jesuit, are likely forgeries as well. 

For protection, they employed the same tactic with Nostradamus, making him pretend to be a fanatical supporter of Catholicism. Needless to say, the VMS signature and letters cannot be corroborated by the appearance of the VMS in any library or book catalog or inventory, nor is it mentioned in any of numerous extant letters of Kircher, et cetera. Are we to believe that a manuscript as mysterious as the VMS was able to circulate publicly or privately among the Catholics for three hundred years without a historical record?