Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

Morten, I don't know what to say.



Your example shows a long-cee plus medieval "z" or rotated-m on the left and a Voynich character on the right and the two do not look the same at all.

I can't comprehend how you could think these two shapes are similar. There's no way that the c and Voynich char would be combined to look like that. That's not how they combined letters.

Look at the "z" shape on the left. It has two bumps. The Voynich char on the right does not have two bumps and still wouldn't have two bumps if it were ligatured to the c.

I'm not sure what you are trying to say. Are you claiming that there is just one character underneath the bar in the marginalia, a rotated m, or two characters, the letter c plus a rotated m? If there are two characters, where does the c end the m begins? It looks like a continuous line from the c to me. Please look at Paris' z above: the z (rotated m) requires a start line. As for the second bump in the glyph, it's there but faint, but more distinct in other instances of that glyph. In the depiction to the right of the c in the marginalia, the interior of this glyph is blurred or colored in.