Here's a question I haven't seen asked, and it's something I haven't been able to resolve in my own mind...
I am quite confident that the letters in the first word are mallier. They are completely consistent with the letterforms on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (which have the same kinds of loops and the same long serif on the "i" and the same style of "r"), and with medieval script.
I'm also pretty confident that the first and last letters in the second word are "a---r" for the same reasons.
But why are the 2nd and 3rd letters in "aller" so SMALL???
Look at the ells in "mallier". Tall. And in luc'z/buc'z/kuc'z. Tall. Yet in "aller/allor" unusually small.
I am quite confident that the letters in the first word are mallier. They are completely consistent with the letterforms on You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. (which have the same kinds of loops and the same long serif on the "i" and the same style of "r"), and with medieval script.
I'm also pretty confident that the first and last letters in the second word are "a---r" for the same reasons.
But why are the 2nd and 3rd letters in "aller" so SMALL???
Look at the ells in "mallier". Tall. And in luc'z/buc'z/kuc'z. Tall. Yet in "aller/allor" unusually small.