(20-10-2018, 06:54 AM)Diane wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.We see none of that sort of discussion in the study today - and as a rule any effort to raise questions about methodology or current practice sees a ton-weight of censure-bricks descend on one's head, because it is impossible to discuss where we've gone wrong, or where we are going well, without footnotes and accurately-attributed examples.
...
This is verbal bashing and denigrating to Voynich researchers. And it is Post #1, so I didn't start it.
I think serious Voynich researchers do give careful thought to methodology and do think about where we might have gone wrong, and do correct their ideas and their methods. I have great respect for the work of other researchers and see no reason for you to constantly put them down.
And you are the one who didn't accurately attribute examples when you claimed repeatedly that you did the first map analysis of the rosettes folio. You failed to attribute the earlier analysis and yet you point the finger at us.
.
Links to articles about methodology are welcome. Telling us we are deficient is flaming.