23-05-2018, 09:17 AM
It's really like 10 words about the manuscript for each 100 words of text. Anyway, as I read through it, here's some quotes that stand out:
That's quite the collection of red flags there, but okay, benefit of the doubt.
Okay so it's getting worse as I read on. He thinks the manuscript is not original because the numbers have been added later, gets a bit conspiracy-theory-like about some scans which are only available in black and white (??)
He does present some well made images suggesting that the map is supposed to be seen in three vertical tiers:
![[Image: TM-7.png?resize=300%2C276]](https://i1.wp.com/occupyingnonexistence.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/TM-7.png?resize=300%2C276)
But that's about all I got from it...
Quote:Before I go on any further, what I have already uncovered within the Manuscript itself, is a very controversial subject, and this Manuscript reveals a very controversial text, that can be perceived as blasphemy to some [...] Given the age, the controversy, the Documentaries made on the subject, and a lot of further associations, I now feel a sense of obligation, which I really did not want, nor asked for.
That's quite the collection of red flags there, but okay, benefit of the doubt.
Quote:For those not knowing what a millennia stands for, one millennia equals 1000 years.
Quote:To save you the reader from continuing any further down a topic of discussion that you may not handle, I’m given you full warning now; this Manuscript is completely Biblical in nature.
Okay so it's getting worse as I read on. He thinks the manuscript is not original because the numbers have been added later, gets a bit conspiracy-theory-like about some scans which are only available in black and white (??)
He does present some well made images suggesting that the map is supposed to be seen in three vertical tiers:
But that's about all I got from it...