For 28v, we had an extensive discussion with Brian back in 2014 or 2015 in his blog. Brian wrote a post, there was a discussion in comments, and then he wrote yet another post. Unfortunately, he deleted (or hid) those two posts, I forgot for what reason. Basically,if I remember correctly, his point was that this sequence encodes a date, something like 1457 or 1475. I disagreed with that.
There are some interesting points about this sequence. First, it's very tiny, but, at the same time it's easy to find if you know where to look. Second, the symbols two to four look as if they were written in two passes - namely, first the sequence "i i i" was put down, and then the remaining elements were put down.
I suspect this is a reminder of some sort, but I don't know what to make of it.
There are some interesting points about this sequence. First, it's very tiny, but, at the same time it's easy to find if you know where to look. Second, the symbols two to four look as if they were written in two passes - namely, first the sequence "i i i" was put down, and then the remaining elements were put down.
I suspect this is a reminder of some sort, but I don't know what to make of it.