(05-04-2018, 03:41 PM)Davidsch wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I definitely do not see an r there, although I can understand it would be obvious to see "rot" here as a repeating pattern,
however, there are two strokes, the left stroke and the right together have the highest resemblance with the letter v at best. (assuming that the right stroke is the last stroke of the same letter). Not the VMS letter V, but the V from this period.
...
I see a typical Gothic Cursive "r" on f29r. The "r" written so that it almost looks like two strokes (so the strokes are separated) was very common in many areas. Scribes who wrote it that way also sometimes brought the two parts a little closer together and ALSO sometimes wrote other kind of "r", the kind that looks like a hump. When they wrote the "r" alone, or at the end of a word, they usually used the separated-stroke style. When it was in the middle of a word, they sometimes used the hump-style.
Here are some examples of the separated "r" from my paleo database. Note that it includes the "r" from 116v marginalia (at the bottom). Note also how these same scribes wrote the letter "v" (below):

