MSG wrote: "Some experts made comments that would fully support your theory of original redaction in the 15th century, such as,..."
You keep saying I have a theory of original redaction in the 15th century. I've already told you that is not the case.
Your use of the phrase "original redaction" is rather confusing, since a redaction is a copy and an "original" is not a copy and some manuscripts include both copied and original material. This terminology is too vague for us to discern what you mean.
A number of the people who say that the VMS has escaped medieval influence believe it to be a hoax, a later rather than earlier creation, so they do not all believe it to be an earlier manuscript.
You keep saying I have a theory of original redaction in the 15th century. I've already told you that is not the case.
Your use of the phrase "original redaction" is rather confusing, since a redaction is a copy and an "original" is not a copy and some manuscripts include both copied and original material. This terminology is too vague for us to discern what you mean.
A number of the people who say that the VMS has escaped medieval influence believe it to be a hoax, a later rather than earlier creation, so they do not all believe it to be an earlier manuscript.