11-02-2018, 10:34 AM
In the second graph on your result, A=13 gave less variance once trended out than A=12. However, the intercept of the two power lines is at aprox 5600 total words using [12,0.56], but then more sharply diverges.
As I suggested. However, this shows that the current implementation of your software is not generating true pseudo-Voynich text, as it does not generate unique words in the same way as the exemplar did.
Quote: The computer simulation is using a constant generation algorithm. Moreover for this implementation some aspects are simplified. Therefore a constant graph is expected.
As I suggested. However, this shows that the current implementation of your software is not generating true pseudo-Voynich text, as it does not generate unique words in the same way as the exemplar did.
Quote: The result demonstrates again that the text of the VMS is not homogenous. Therefore Heap's law didn't apply here.Actually, I would argue that Heap's is applying here, as we see in the the stars graph (and herbal in a previous post). Remember we are dealing with a statistical law not a true power law, and as such variation is to be expected. But the prediction line and real plots both have a weak constant association.