Morten St George Theory

[Morten St. George]

Morten St George
Koen Gh's comment is not a matter of opinion. That is demonstrably a hole in the page.
If you need more evidence, please look at the two images below.
One is the hole in 102v1, and next to it are the roots of the plant on 102r2.
It is undeniably those roots we see peeking through the hole.

Thanks. I have modified my web page to call it a "cutout" rather than a drawing. It does not need the roots to be a tapir. It still has the correct shape and tail. BTW, was this hole there when Voynich owned the manuscript? Do other folios have large holes?

Note that the tapir and the plant (or protozoa) are not essential. The naked women in green, plant infested water in combination with depictions of more than a hundred tropical plants will suffice.

---

Morten St George
Koen Gh's comment is not a matter of opinion. That is demonstrably a hole in the page.
If you need more evidence, please look at the two images below.
One is the hole in 102v1, and next to it are the roots of the plant on 102r2.
It is undeniably those roots we see peeking through the hole.

Thanks. I have modified my web page to call it a "cutout" rather than a drawing. It does not need the roots to be a tapir. It still has the correct shape and tail. BTW, was this hole there when Voynich owned the manuscript? Do other folios have large holes?

Note that the tapir and the plant (or protozoa) are not essential. The naked women in green, plant infested water in combination with depictions of more than a hundred tropical plants will suffice.