25-01-2018, 06:07 AM
Hi Morten St George,
I'm creating this thread for the discussion of the theory you present on your website, which is better than discussing it in the thread about protein analysis.
I'll admit I have not read your whole website, but just from the Q & A page you linked to, several problems are apparent.
Several of the assertions you make there are incorrect.
I don't have time to go into details this morning,but for starters, a simple factual observation:
you claim that the male character on 80r is the only one and that "no other males are depicted in the manuscript". This is incorrect: there are several men in the Voynich.
If you go over to the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. thread, you'll find that, per Koen Gh and Sam G's count, there are about 17% men in the zodiac section, including the obvious central figures of the male Sagittarius and one of the Gemini twins.
As for Quire 13, there appear to be 4 men depicted there.
I'm creating this thread for the discussion of the theory you present on your website, which is better than discussing it in the thread about protein analysis.
I'll admit I have not read your whole website, but just from the Q & A page you linked to, several problems are apparent.
Several of the assertions you make there are incorrect.
I don't have time to go into details this morning,but for starters, a simple factual observation:
you claim that the male character on 80r is the only one and that "no other males are depicted in the manuscript". This is incorrect: there are several men in the Voynich.
If you go over to the You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. thread, you'll find that, per Koen Gh and Sam G's count, there are about 17% men in the zodiac section, including the obvious central figures of the male Sagittarius and one of the Gemini twins.
As for Quire 13, there appear to be 4 men depicted there.


![[+]](https://www.voynich.ninja/images/collapse_collapsed.png)