26-02-2016, 04:43 AM
I think you missed my point.
I wasn't arguing about the interpretation of "pes" as foot.
I was saying that you have taken one of the most common word-tokens in the entire document and applied "foot" to it even though it makes no sense whatsoever for the word to appear so frequently, either in the symbolic context of the illustrations or in a grammatical context.
By arbitrarily anagraming the words, you are imposing your desired results on the data rather than letting the data lead you to the solution.
I wasn't arguing about the interpretation of "pes" as foot.
I was saying that you have taken one of the most common word-tokens in the entire document and applied "foot" to it even though it makes no sense whatsoever for the word to appear so frequently, either in the symbolic context of the illustrations or in a grammatical context.
By arbitrarily anagraming the words, you are imposing your desired results on the data rather than letting the data lead you to the solution.