[split] Glyph writing convention discussion
#10
(19-09-2017, 07:37 PM)davidjackson wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I'd point out that in my head I'm still under 30..  Cool
Can I ask that we don't deviate from the standard of // for phenomes, as that is universal.
Also, the <> indicate comments in the interlinear transcription files. We shouldn't deviate from the standards established in Eva.


I'm perfectly happy with // for phonemes.

I can see Emma's point about the angle brackets being lost on websites (they're interpreted as HTML tags).

I'm not sure what I'll do for VMS shapes but I'm not thrilled about using square brackets because of the conflict with academic and publishing-industry standards. Maybe a pipe symbol. Pretty much every font has it and it's right next to the square brackets and you only have to find one key rather than two (similar to the angle brackets on sounds).   |VMS glyph shape|  /VMS sound/
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] Glyph writing convention discussion - by -JKP- - 19-09-2017, 09:44 PM
RE: Positional Rigidity in the VMS - by -JKP- - 18-09-2017, 11:41 PM
RE: Positional Rigidity in the VMS - by -JKP- - 19-09-2017, 12:21 AM
RE: Positional Rigidity in the VMS - by Davidsch - 19-09-2017, 03:49 PM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Designing the glyph system Pointless.. 10 2,551 18-07-2026, 01:04 PM
Last Post: ololololo
  [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion -JKP- 38 38,501 18-09-2017, 03:09 PM
Last Post: Anton
  Dee's Table Glyph's Match Voynich Glyph's stellar 3 11,377 06-10-2016, 09:57 AM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)