[split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion
#30
Quote:For instance the [q]-glyph is in 99,5% the first glyph in a glyph group and is followed in 97 % by an [o]-glyph.


OK, the first part of the statement doesn't make sense because 99,5% of words in the corpus aren't [q] AFAIK. And if it is followed 97% of the times by [o] that's no different from the Romance language rule of Q[u].
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: [split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion - by davidjackson - 17-09-2017, 10:15 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by farmerjohn - 16-09-2017, 07:59 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 16-09-2017, 08:01 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by MarcoP - 16-09-2017, 08:20 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 16-09-2017, 08:37 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 16-09-2017, 08:39 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 16-09-2017, 09:00 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by farmerjohn - 16-09-2017, 09:45 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 16-09-2017, 09:54 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 17-09-2017, 12:25 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by Torsten - 17-09-2017, 09:45 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by MarcoP - 16-09-2017, 10:01 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 16-09-2017, 10:04 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 16-09-2017, 10:13 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by MarcoP - 16-09-2017, 10:44 PM
RE: An interview with Stephen Bax - by -JKP- - 17-09-2017, 09:45 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  [split] Glyph writing convention discussion -JKP- 9 12,770 19-09-2017, 09:44 PM
Last Post: -JKP-

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)