[split] An interview with Stephen Bax - 1 to 1 substitution discussion

[-JKP-]

Whatever he may have said to Nick about bigraphs and trigraphs is not relevant until it's established that they exist.

I find this point of view peculiar. If you think everything that is not established is irrelevant, we can resume our conversation when the manuscript is fully translated.

Somehow my answer to this got lost when the thread was split. It's late. I'm too tired to hunt for it, but my comment was within the context of Stephen's method, Nick's question, and Stephen's response, not a general comment. You know me well enough to know that I would not discount something simply because it has not yet been firmly established.