To all of you... do you honestly believe that the VMS is a one-to-one substitution code in a natural language?
No one should be immune from critical analysis of their theories, regardless of their credentials, especially in Voynich studies where there are no experts.*
* (To be an "expert" in Voynich studies one needs high-level expertise in code-breaking, medieval languages, medieval paleography, history, iconographic analysis, botany, and more. Not a single one of us is an expert, no matter what credentials or experience we may have. We are all students of the VMS and there are many people with credentials equal or greater than Bax's who have spent decades working on this who receive less respect than he does. Think about it.)
No one should be immune from critical analysis of their theories, regardless of their credentials, especially in Voynich studies where there are no experts.*
* (To be an "expert" in Voynich studies one needs high-level expertise in code-breaking, medieval languages, medieval paleography, history, iconographic analysis, botany, and more. Not a single one of us is an expert, no matter what credentials or experience we may have. We are all students of the VMS and there are many people with credentials equal or greater than Bax's who have spent decades working on this who receive less respect than he does. Think about it.)