Not only plant ID's must have a reference to a person, but also to an originating author/manuscript + date,
but also all other "properties" (to use the exact word again: any "botanical nomenclatures" that you can think of) must have at least 1 reference.
But only one reference is really very poor.
Only with historical and/or originating references, as suggested in my prev. posting, such a list will be useful.
but also all other "properties" (to use the exact word again: any "botanical nomenclatures" that you can think of) must have at least 1 reference.
But only one reference is really very poor.
Only with historical and/or originating references, as suggested in my prev. posting, such a list will be useful.

