27-08-2017, 08:45 PM
Woah, lot of excitement here. Let's lay out our objectives first.
We're currently interviewing experts on Voynich related subjects. We're not discussing solutions here.
So when we interview prof Bax, or anyone else in the current series, it will purely be as a professional in his field of expertise.
We have a vague script outlining the questions, although this changes depending upon the thrust of the conversation. If the subject wishes, they can see the questions in advance (in this series).
We certainly have no intention of getting into a solution specific discussion. But if we do, then we will be prearmed with material to cross examine the witness. If, and only if, they want to venture into that territory.
Now, if in the future we decide to setup a panel style webcam, participants will be advised of the format when being invited, and ground rules will be laid out. Equally if we decide to interview claimed solution solvers. But that's not what we are proposing in the first series.
So, I repeat the original question: does Anyone have an original question to put to a professor of linguistics interested in the Voynich?
(The marginalia proposal was excellent, by the way).
We're currently interviewing experts on Voynich related subjects. We're not discussing solutions here.
So when we interview prof Bax, or anyone else in the current series, it will purely be as a professional in his field of expertise.
We have a vague script outlining the questions, although this changes depending upon the thrust of the conversation. If the subject wishes, they can see the questions in advance (in this series).
We certainly have no intention of getting into a solution specific discussion. But if we do, then we will be prearmed with material to cross examine the witness. If, and only if, they want to venture into that territory.
Now, if in the future we decide to setup a panel style webcam, participants will be advised of the format when being invited, and ground rules will be laid out. Equally if we decide to interview claimed solution solvers. But that's not what we are proposing in the first series.
So, I repeat the original question: does Anyone have an original question to put to a professor of linguistics interested in the Voynich?
(The marginalia proposal was excellent, by the way).