Judging by the shape of the two "L"s at the beginning of the notes, I also prefer to think now that mallier is not an undivided word, since the rest doubled "LL"s are connected in the same special way. Therefore I get such an interpretationn:
Mal lier aller lucem her (probably, some verb in imperative) omnia ...........
Supposing that the first part of the sentence in German wholy, perhaps, it can be:
Mal lier aller lucht* her (probably, some verb in imperative) omnia ...........
* - lucht or luchte sometimes was used instead of licht (as much as I've understood from German texts)
In general, the first and the latter variant have the same or similar meaning. I need help of German speaking
As Anton mentioned, the verb lieren may mean lehren, lernen. But there is another meaning: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. - to let go, to free, to lose, to leave, to waste, etc.
The link also contains the word Lier, but I can't understand for sure, what it may mean (difficulty with translation). Of course, the first variant could be more logical, but I will make both, just in case, as I don't know, which is more correct.
a)
1. Learn the sign, the whole light here (+verb imperative), all ..............
2. Portray, learn the whole light here (+verb imperative) all ...........
b)
1. Leave the sign, the whole light here (+verb imperative) all ...........
2. Portray, let go the whole light here (+verb imperative) all ...........
I'm quite not sure in the word "vnll" or "pnll", or "viill" and so on, therefore I leave it as is.
If you are interested in my interpretation of the Voynichese part, it can be read as "luminare notas", so I would read the whole sentence as: Learn the sign, the whole light here "vnll" all to light up/illuminate the notes. or[b] [/b]Portray, let go the whole light here, "unll" all to light up/illuminate the notes.
I still can't give a strict solution with my method, but sometimes I even don't know, what to do with such coincidences...
Mal lier aller lucem her (probably, some verb in imperative) omnia ...........
Supposing that the first part of the sentence in German wholy, perhaps, it can be:
Mal lier aller lucht* her (probably, some verb in imperative) omnia ...........
* - lucht or luchte sometimes was used instead of licht (as much as I've understood from German texts)
In general, the first and the latter variant have the same or similar meaning. I need help of German speaking
As Anton mentioned, the verb lieren may mean lehren, lernen. But there is another meaning: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. - to let go, to free, to lose, to leave, to waste, etc.
The link also contains the word Lier, but I can't understand for sure, what it may mean (difficulty with translation). Of course, the first variant could be more logical, but I will make both, just in case, as I don't know, which is more correct.
a)
1. Learn the sign, the whole light here (+verb imperative), all ..............
2. Portray, learn the whole light here (+verb imperative) all ...........
b)
1. Leave the sign, the whole light here (+verb imperative) all ...........
2. Portray, let go the whole light here (+verb imperative) all ...........
I'm quite not sure in the word "vnll" or "pnll", or "viill" and so on, therefore I leave it as is.
If you are interested in my interpretation of the Voynichese part, it can be read as "luminare notas", so I would read the whole sentence as: Learn the sign, the whole light here "vnll" all to light up/illuminate the notes. or[b] [/b]Portray, let go the whole light here, "unll" all to light up/illuminate the notes.
I still can't give a strict solution with my method, but sometimes I even don't know, what to do with such coincidences...