20-02-2016, 04:28 PM
(20-02-2016, 01:05 PM)don of tallahassee wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Nope. I didn't use Professor Stolfi's core, mantle, crust idea. As far as I know, only you and Nick Pelling have thought I did. I do not know why you think this.
Stolfi has also published a grammar describing Voynichese words, so it's natural to refer to his work when discussing yours. Why do you think that i think that you've based your grammar on Stolfi's ideas? (I don't)
Quote:The only hard and fast criteria I employed was to use what was to be found in the words.
Sure, but why six groups instead of seven for example? Why 'qockhe' in group 1 instead of having only 'qock' in group 1 and 'he' in some other group?
Quote:I'm sorry the author of the VMS didn't use a simpler grammar (maybe one with only three elements/code tables?) to accommodate your preferences.
A simpler grammar is more informational and has more value. It's not a matter of what i want. I'm sure you realize this or else you would have a 10 group grammar instead.
Quote:I'm only showing the proposed pattern, sequence and code tables. They seem to work for 913 out of 918 words, so far - maybe 915 out of 918, if, and when, the other two Group/Table I codes are verified and attributed.
I'll run some tests to confirm this.
Quote:I'm not sure how to ask this nicely, but, in the future on this thread, could we please discuss the pros and cons of the pattern, sequence and codes I have proposed rather than your preferences and expectations or the core, mantle, crust theory of Professor Stolfi.
I'll continue to post what i find relevant. Maybe you could stop being so patronizing in your replies?