Quote:I explored the idea that those connections MIGHT go back prior to Jakobi á Tepenecz, that he might not have gotten the book from Rudolph II
I'm planning to open a separate thread about that Mnishovsky reference shortly. Not that I have something strikingly new to say, but I just want to initiate a discussion.
Quote:Also, I can't be of much help with the subject of this thread, but I'm reading it with great interest!
Good to know that. Personally I don't like long posts with plenty of details (my eyesight is poor and I quickly get tired when I read lengthy stuff from screen), but here I somehow engaged myself in the like practice, so I was afraid it looks a bit boring
Quote:I'm still on the fence about it, but kind of prefer "attached" as it reflects the ambiguity.
That's really not of much importance, because the main point is that the "oppklaebet" exlibris is on the binding, while the other one is on folio 2. So it must be two different books, that was my main point.