Stick to the topic of this publication please!
That's exactly what I thought as well. Sherwood's shaky ID's and anagramming? Ouch...
But Skinner's personal thoughts occupy only like three pages in this book, they are not really developed. It feels more like he couldn't resist squeezing in some personal musings. Which can be hard to resist indeed
(19-06-2017, 08:27 PM)-JKP- wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.I just realized today there's a preview. Unfortunately, I couldn't read it all. The repeated references to Sherwood's plant IDs, and further assumptions based upon those IDs, had me shaking my head and when additional references Sherwood's anagramed plant names occurred (you might remember the reference to the name "garlic" to a plant that doesn't even remotely resemble garlic), I stopped reading.
That's exactly what I thought as well. Sherwood's shaky ID's and anagramming? Ouch...
But Skinner's personal thoughts occupy only like three pages in this book, they are not really developed. It feels more like he couldn't resist squeezing in some personal musings. Which can be hard to resist indeed