26-05-2017, 08:14 PM
But if it's not natural language, then what is it? I just don't think that something like "auto-copying" is a realistic option, if only because of the historical context. Something "real", some kind of information, must have been at the basis of this text.
It's not horror vacui or wishful thinking on my part. In fact I'd be perfectly fine with the text being just filler, because the images contain a ton of information for those who knew how to read them. They could stand on their own, or with just some labels. But the assumption that someone would generate this amount of nonsense text in this way "just because" seems very unlikely and unrealistic to me.
It's not horror vacui or wishful thinking on my part. In fact I'd be perfectly fine with the text being just filler, because the images contain a ton of information for those who knew how to read them. They could stand on their own, or with just some labels. But the assumption that someone would generate this amount of nonsense text in this way "just because" seems very unlikely and unrealistic to me.