While wrestling with the script I've had the impression that the strokes on the i's were added by someone else. They are definitely not applied all the time, which seems to me an indicator of either various scribes or a later i-dotter. See for example this text from f.174v. There are dotted and undotted i's, though I can't eliminate the possibility that the dots were in an ink that faded more easily.
|
[Trinity] Questions about Trinity MS script
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads… | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
| [Trinity] General discussion of Trinity College MS O.2.48 Apuleii Herbarium | MarcoP | 77 | 81,741 |
22-07-2022, 02:08 PM Last Post: cvetkakocj@rogers.com |
|
| [Trinity] Plant identification in Trinity College MS O.2.48 Apuleii Herbarium | Koen G | 83 | 80,773 |
18-05-2017, 04:23 PM Last Post: Diane |
|
| [Trinity] Parallels between Voynich and Trinity College MS O.2.48 | Koen G | 28 | 30,790 |
10-05-2017, 08:18 AM Last Post: Koen G |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

