An explanation of the Voynich Manuscript text

[Torsten]

These look like coincidences to me. 

There are not some places. It happens everywhere. 

I've explicitly accounted for the observations of Currier, and of Montemurro and Zanette.

On one side you say that within a section the words in the VMS are randomly used. On the other side you say that you accept that the VMS changes over time and that you accept the observation that similar words do co-occur throughout the script. If both statements are true it must be possible to demonstrate clear breaks between different sections of the manuscripts. Your graphs for page cluster show that no clear breaks between different sections exists (see You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.). Therefore both statements can't be true at the same time.