23-04-2017, 09:49 PM
(23-04-2017, 09:26 PM)Emma May Smith wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.You haven't provided evidence, even you don't believe that. You've simply provided a way to generate a very similar text. Just because you can make a text in that way does not mean the author did. This very same discussion was had with Rugg's theory. He beat you to the punch by over a decade, and I don't see what you've added to his theory.
No, I have provided evidence. One of the problems I have is that most people don't know what random looks like, and attach meaning to coincidences.
My theory is completely different from Gordon Rugg's. Did you read and understand my blog articles?