13-04-2017, 10:03 PM
Rene, I can't agree with you neither. What I presented are not examples why the text could be meaningful. Those are examples of what is not very probable to be observed in a randomly generated (hence meaningless) text. As I suggested above, this is not positive evidence, but evidence ex contrario. I don't see why the observations that I proposed are "speculative".
But maybe let's not wander too far offtopic from Donald's material. Don't remember if we have already a thread of "meaningful" vs "meaningless", if not, let's create one, if yes, then let's move certain posts thereto. (I'm sorry I have to run right now).
But maybe let's not wander too far offtopic from Donald's material. Don't remember if we have already a thread of "meaningful" vs "meaningless", if not, let's create one, if yes, then let's move certain posts thereto. (I'm sorry I have to run right now).