Why the auto-copying hypothesis is not valid?
#10
(09-02-2017, 05:01 AM)stellar wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view....

Plus why would the Author of the VMS use the same glyphs for chives and fishes which fit into a strategy to setup a decoding process for the VMS.  The Author obviously intended to do what I have demonstrated here in this image below.
...

You appear to be assuming the labels are nouns. There's no proof that they are. The same glyphs would be used if they were both classified as "water" or male/female, or if they were both governed by the same planet or any of the other Galenesque designations popular in the middle ages.

You also assume 1) the glyphs have to be converted to numbers 2) which are then added, 3) which are then associated with a pre-chosen language without sufficient proof that it is in fact underlying the system, and 4) which are then turned into words on the basis of subjective guesses. This is a four-step process that is unproven and essentially a one-way cipher.


You can't use a system with low plausibility to disprove a completely different theory.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
RE: Why the auto-copying hypothesis is not valid? - by -JKP- - 11-03-2017, 12:06 AM

Possibly Related Threads…
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  Hand Copying the Entire Manuscript seridane 19 3,262 30-09-2026, 06:23 PM
Last Post: seridane

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)