(09-03-2017, 06:24 AM)davidjackson wrote: You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.Indeed Marco and Jkp. I think that a visual look at the layout of these glyphs tends to make you think that they can't be letters, but must instead by a sense marker of some sort - a pilcrow or system of per cola et commata.Hi all!
As you know, my interpretations of the characters: k, t, p, f are:
k, p - c, g, q
t, f - p, b, m
Maybe, I'm mistaken about their exact meaning, but I strongly believe that they can be C and P in the sense of markers (paragraph, capitulum). Of course, it doesn't mean that all k's, p's, t's and f's are markers in the text. I think that only a part of these characters represents markers of a paragraph or/and a chapter. I'm sure, you payed attention that many of these characters in initial words of lines or paragraphs have some differences in shape from the same ones in the text, in particular, in the center of a word, excluding some rare questionable examples. These differences: stretched top of F and P (sometimes decorated), long K and T. In the same time, k, t, p, f in initial words which have usual shape could be just first letters (C, P) of those words.
In addition, I support the idea that not all visual paragraphs are really paragraphs.