[Palaeography] There is evidence of corrections within the text

[MarcoP]

Statement
There is evidence that corrections to the text has been carried out.

Explanation
It has been asserted in the past that the text was written fluidly in one pass and that there is no evidence of scraping out, or amendments to the text.

This is incorrect, as demonstrated in You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view.. We can safely say that the text appears to have been corrected, possibly in an attempt to proof-read.

Hi David,
I am sorry for the late comment. I must have missed the thread in which the statement has been discussed before the poll was started.

While I do agree on the statement, the explanation seems to me to somehow obscure the point.
The explanation mentions scraping and fluidity. I think that voting on the presence of corrections is not the same as voting on the use of scraping. For instance, all the corrections mentioned by Rene (You are not allowed to view links. Register or Login to view. and "Non-sequential writing", just below) involve no scraping. If we are voting on scraping too, it should be added to the statement (and I am not sure I would still agree).
Maybe a few examples should be extracted from the thread you mentioned and attached here.

The subject of "fluidity" is even trickier and I think it could be left out without damage for the relevance of the statement.